Effect of Geopolitical Risk on Bitcoin’s Price From 2016-2021: Comparative Analysis Pre-During Covid-19 Pandemic Period
Article Sidebar
-
Bitcoin, Geopolitical Risks, Geopolitical Acts, Geopolitical Threat, OLS Estimations, Quantile Estimations
Abstract
This study investigates the effects of geopolitical risks (GPR) and its component indexes on Bitcoin's price from January 1, 2016, to December 31, 2021, with a specific focus on how the COVID-19 pandemic influenced the relationship between GPR and Bitcoin's price. We employed quantitative data analysis techniques, including Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) and Quantile Regression (QQ), to analyze the data over the specified period. The study covers a comprehensive dataset from January 1, 2016, to December 31, 2021, capturing both pre- and during-COVID-19 pandemic phases. The OLS estimations show that Bitcoin's price is both positively and negatively related to GPR and its components, although these relationships were statistically insignificant before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, Quantile Regression results indicate that the effects of GPR and its component GPRA on Bitcoin's price are positive and statistically significant at the higher quantiles, particularly during the COVID-19 pandemic. The study concludes that while the direct effects of geopolitical risks on Bitcoin's price may not be statistically significant across the board, significant positive impacts are observed at higher price quantiles, especially during periods of heightened geopolitical uncertainty, such as the COVID-19 pandemic. The findings suggest that Bitcoin could serve as a hedge against geopolitical risks, particularly in times of extreme global uncertainty. This research provides valuable insights for investors considering Bitcoin as a potential investment during economic recessions or periods of geopolitical instability. Future research should explore a broader scope of variables and methodologies to further understand the complex dynamics between geopolitical risks and cryptocurrency markets.
Full text article
References
Al Mamun, M., Uddin, G. S., Suleman, M. T., & Kang, S. H. (2020). Geopolitical risk, uncertainty and Bitcoin investment. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 540, 123107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2019.123107 Google Scholar | Crossref | WorldCat
Aysan, A. F., Demir, E., Gozgor, G., & Lau, C. K. (2019). Effects of the Geopolitical Risks on Bitcoin Returns and Volatility. Research in International Business. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2018.09.011 Google Scholar | Crossref | WorldCat
Baldwin, R., & Mauro, B. W. (2020). Economics in the Time of COVID-19. Centre for Economic Policy Research, 115. Google Scholar | WorldCat
Bouri, E., Gupta, R., & Vo, X. V. (2020). Jumps in Geopolitical Risk and the Cryptocurrency Market: The Singularity of Bitcoin. Google Scholar | WorldCat
Bouria, E., Gupta, R., Tiwari, A. K., & Roubau, D. (2017, November). Does Bitcoin hedge global uncertainty? Evidence from wavelet-based quantile-in-quantile regressions. Finance Research Letters, 23, 87-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2017.02.009 Google Scholar | Crossref | WorldCat
Caldara, D., & Iacoviello, M. (2018). Measuring Geopolitical Risk. International Finance Discussion Papers, 25(6) 1-47. https://doi.org/10.17016/IFDP.2018.1222 Google Scholar | Crossref | WorldCat
Colon, F. K. (2021). The effect of political and economic uncertainty on the cryptocurrency market. Finance Research Letters, 39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2020.101621 Google Scholar | Crossref | WorldCat
Corbet, S., Larkin, C., & Lucey, B. (2020). The contagion effects of the COVID-19 pandemic: Evidence from gold and cryptocurrencies. Financ Res Lett, 35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2020.101554 Google Scholar | Crossref | WorldCat
Ikeda-Chelminska, M. (2020). Geopolitical Forecasting in Volatile Times. Enterprising Investor. Google Scholar | WorldCat
Jacobsen, B., Lee, J. B., & Berkman, H. (2011). Berkman, Henk, Ben Jacobsen, and John B. Lee. Journal of Financial Economics, 313-332. Google Scholar | WorldCat
Laurent, L. (2021, December 11). Bloomberg. Retrieved from The Washington Post: https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/even-the-smartest-investors-fall-for-crypto-fomo/2021/12/10/4b4c6e78-598f-11ec-8396-5552bef55c3c_story.html Google Scholar | WorldCat
Nakamoto, S. (2008). Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System. Retrieved from https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf.] Google Scholar | WorldCat
Sharif, A., Aloui, C., & Yarovaya, L. (2020). COVID-19 pandemic, oil prices, stock market, geopolitical risk and policy uncertainty nexus in the US economy: Fresh evidence from the wavelet-based approach. International Review of Financial Analysis, 70(May), 101496. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2020.101496 Google Scholar | Crossref | WorldCat
Takushi, C. (2015). Geopolitical Research and Geopolitical Economics. Retrieved from https://geopoliticalresearch.com/?page_id=454 Google Scholar | WorldCat
Tavares, J. (2004). The open society assesses its enemies: shocks, disasters and terrorist. Journal of Monetary Economics, 51(5), 1039-1070. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmoneco.2004.04.009 Google Scholar | Crossref | WorldCat
The Economic Times. (2022). Definition of 'Capital Market'. United Kingdom: English Edition. The Week Staff. (2021). Bitcoin FOMO is here. New York: THE WEEK. Retrieved from https://theweek.com/business/1006503/bitcoin-fear-of-missing-out-drives-a-new-mania Google Scholar | WorldCat
World Health Organization. (2020a). Corona Virus Disease Situation. Retrieved from https://www.who.int/ Google Scholar | WorldCat
Yaomi, I. (2021). Mata Uang Kripto Paling Menguntungkan untuk Diinvestasikan Pada Akhir 2021. Jakarta: Bisnis.com. Google Scholar | WorldCat
Zhang, D., & Broadstock, D. C. (2018, July). Global financial crisis and rising connectedness in the international commodity markets. International Review of Financial Analysis, 47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2018.08.003 Google Scholar | Crossref | WorldCat
Authors
Copyright (c) 2023 Mey Frida Yosefa Bangun, Dezie Leonarda Warganegara

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright / Open Access Policy
This journal provides immediate and free open access to all its content and is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). This means readers are permitted to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author, as long as proper attribution is given. This policy is consistent with the Budapest Open Access Initiative (BOAI) definition of open access.